Discussion:
Bug#1087932: ITP: python-deadlib -- Python dead batteries
Add Reply
Alexandre Detiste
2024-11-20 14:10:01 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Hi,

I guess the rough plan is to create +/- one binary target per module.

But not for distutils.

And not for cgi & cgitb ... we have "python-legacy-cgi" which is striving:
https://qa.debian.org/popcon.php?package=python-legacy-cgi

Maybe not other completely useless modules. (pipes ?)

Instead of blacklisting each module we don"t need
it would be better to whitelist the ones we do need;
in the wiki for example.

I need telnetlib ;-) (I will gladly let this override #1084736)

Greetings
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
* Package name : python-deadlib
Version : 3.13.0
Upstream Contact: Jeong, YunWon
* URL : https://github.com/youknowone/python-deadlib
* License : PSF-2.0
Programming Lang: Python
Description : Python dead batteries
python-deadlib provides all dead batteries from Python.
.
This will help to packages that upstream does not remove the dead
modules form their code.
.
I plan maintain it under Debian Python Team umbrella. If anyone
found any concern about this package, please let me know.
Andrey Rakhmatullin
2024-11-20 19:40:01 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Alexandre Detiste
Maybe not other completely useless modules. (pipes ?)
I think somebody (you?) recently want to vendor pipes to fix something, or
maybe it was fixed in a different way instead?
--
WBR, wRAR
Ananthu C V
2024-11-20 20:00:02 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Andrey Rakhmatullin
Post by Alexandre Detiste
Maybe not other completely useless modules. (pipes ?)
I think somebody (you?) recently want to vendor pipes to fix something, or
maybe it was fixed in a different way instead?
--
WBR, wRAR
I remember a thread that discussed using shlex in place of pipes. I believe
it was pipes.quote -> shlex.quote or so.
--
Best,
Ananthu
Loading...